ok, is there some specific actionable feedback that we could incorporate to make things smoother for the next person? (other than fixing this mac os bug)
-have a way for people to engage, make them feel welcome
-some type of visual walkthrough or ideally tutorial to get started
-timely assistance for coders. someone dedicated to onboarding Happ devs.
-organization within the group, or at least some type of direction for someone to go when they are offering volunteer services
I have not been given any clear instructions about how I can contribute to the community. Multiple attempts through multiple people. Sure im a new coder but extensively knowledgable about cryptography and distributed networks, plus I have many other skills beyond development, plus we have a team of experienced coders who are just new to HC. Also a large group of non-technical people who want to contribute
there is no feeling of critique, just very simply that we want to help move this amazing project along
thank you for your diligence and interest!
i recently went over https://docs.rs/hdk/0.0.100/hdk/
@pauldaoust provides a lot of updates and documentation generally
@bear regularly organises events for all skill levels
@Connoropolous is often lurking in the forum and generally being helpful
elemental chat is a public and actively developed zome on the new infrastructure - https://github.com/holochain/elemental-chat
respectfully though “have a way for people to engage” is neither specific nor actionable - i’m engaging with you right now, there are many github repositories and projects in active development from many teams
it sounds like you want a new and different way for people to engage, but i have to guess what that might be
is there something you want to try and build or an existing project that catches your eye?
it sounds to me like the onboarding experience is something you have energy for, maybe one of the above people would like a hand?
I am very happy to discuss my experience in detail and provide constructive feedback. The main challenge is long delays in responses… from a business perspective I believe there should be someone who’s main job is to engage people. Is this not what PR is about? Also I would think that engagement would be warm. You and Paul, are definitely that!
Someone trying to help a project should not have to consistently re-ping the team to get answers. As far as docs, I completely understand it takes time, but RSM came out last fall. Additionally, myself and others have offered to assist in not only documentation, but literally anything, thus to no avail. It’s not like I try something once and give up, I’m also not the only person with these perspectives but the only one willing to speak up on the forum it seems like – despite my social anxiety and strong resistance to public communication spaces – now I am in too much heartbreak to worry about it
Specifically, what can we do to get HC launched? make Elemental strong?
A multi-currency platform? backend for a Commons engine?
How can we capitalize on the valuable human resource of time? Onboard every single person who arrives excited and then leaves due to lack of engagement?
and sorry I did not know that Connor and Stevee were core / at least that I should reach out to them
bear was rude to me and people I know, do not wish to speak to him ever again
guillem is great but yes that where im getting the discouragment about being new… i think he’s overworked, or maybe like me not that social or clear with communication, its really not that big of deal other than should we not have a plan for new developers? I would rather have someone who isnt biased by preconceived notions of the old ways of coding and architechture. Its a good idea for a business to sculpt beginners… with the right training they wont be subject to potential bad habits. in business often times are at the mercy of previous experience, where newbies can be molded. I would much rather have someone hungry, willing to work super hard, willing to experiment/fail, willing to push their comfort zone!
havent been referred to speak with Phillip, that would be awesome to chat! really fantastic work that he’s doing and low code is a big passion of mine
I was not referred to you either, David, which is unfortunate because I can see that you are the most helpful and engaging. irony would have I should have started this way… took me a long time to understand the team methodology – if there is one – are you acting as a DAO or something? why is there so much passing back and forth /run around? it seems discoherent from the surface (no judgement, merely honest feedback)
what is your role? obv tech, but what im curious what ways we can work together
yes the main goal is to start writing Happs and onoard the dozens of people wanting to enhance HC, including a handful of devs
FOSS is rarely coherent, open source is diffuse and messy by nature - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cathedral_and_the_Bazaar
open source development is sadly often not efficient or welcoming, I’m saying this as someone who’s entire career has been in and around open source in some way, with easily 10 000+ hours of unpaid, unmanaged, often actively discouraged work clocked across several ecosystems, notably Drupal, then clojure(script) and now crypto
nobody wants it to be shitty, or to be rude, or short, or overworked… on the whole everyone generally wants a good experience for themselves and others, FOSS contributors are some of the most idealistic, motivated, optimistic people i’ve met, and most large open source projects are desperate for a smoother learning curve and the next generation of participants to find their way - it’s the same desires and tensions here as everywhere else
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXgbV7jB_Bc from around 41:00 feels relevant to me here - specifically the idea of the “ambiguous collective”
so let’s define who “we” is when you say “we should…”
what I hear when you say “there should be a dedicated person onboarding new people” I hear “I am volunteering to onboard new people every day for the next 2-3 years”
what I hear when you say “we should have a plan for new developers” I hear “I am going to make, execute and promote a plan for new developers”
this is how i contextualize my interactions with all the people listed above, and many others i didn’t list out by name, it’s the only way I know that open source can possibly work over the long haul - the conversation always starts at “I am willing/going to do this”
when you say “are you acting as a DAO” it sounds more like you’re saying “I want someone else to do (or pay for) these things” - the short answer to which is no, “they” probably won’t, even if “we” all agree it would be great for those things to exist/happen
( hi folks. as David says, I’m often lurking in the forums, and occasionally helpful, when I see something clear that someone is struggling with that I have an easy to offer answer to. To clarify tho, I’m not core team, tho I was at some point. I am working on a couple of serious Holochain applications via a design/dev studio I cofounded, sprillow.com, which is why I stay in the loop with Holochain and add back where I can)
Having been on the core team, I know they work very hard and very dedicated, and get spread too thinly. Having said that, I sympathize greatly with developers trying to pick up Holochain and contribute. There are soooo many barriers. The dividedness of what documentation that does exist seems primary. I think it is not that it doesn’t exist, but is disorganized, and having no clear way to understand what is where, and who to try to engage with where. The project feels more immature from the outside than it is, technically speaking, due to a seeming disorder/chaos. The lack of a reliable changelog that cuts across the Holochain tech stack is very high among the adoption issues.
I’ve just posted my non-Big Sur comment on that as hitting similar issues but with Catalina which may or may not be related:
yeah @Connoropolous probably fair, even when i’m making documentation that i feel really would be useful i’m often not exactly sure where to put it so that it reaches the intended audience
i ended up dumping most of what i’ve done on crates.io but i don’t think that’s very obvious if you’re not rust-native (although if you work with rust a lot i think it makes sense)
Just as a comparison to your issue, I have a Mac Mini running Big Sur and was able to get everything installed correctly, including Holonix.
Thanks @jaclynchorton! Good info. Did your Mac mini come with big sur installed, or did you upgrade from Catalina, or from another OS?
The confirmed cases I’ve heard of are all upgrades from Catalina to Big Sur.
No, I upgraded it from Catalina.
I’m a bit late here but - wow - that is such a great post. THANK YOU.
He’s the God! Haha! Along with Arthur; he fits that profile like hell! Haha!
Hi , thanks all for ths comments, I’m new with the same issue, waiting for news!! thanks
MacBook Pro (13-inch, 2018, Four Thunderbolt 3 Ports)
2.3 GHz Intel Core i5 de 4 núcleos
8 GB 2133 MHz LPDDR3
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 1536 MB
thanks @Harlan , I’ll try!! I’ll give u a feedback!
Just wanted to throw in that I’m having the same issue as the OP here. Can’t get nix to build my environment at all, either through
nix-shell https://nightly.holochain.love or just running the shell through the holochain gym. Been looking around to see if there are any solutions.